Solar Cells on Electric Cars Make Cents

by: John Ryden July 11, 2008 | about stocks: TM    

John Ryden

About this author:
Become a Contributor Submit an Article
  • Font Size:
  • Print

Adding solar cells to any electric car will reduce the cost to operate the car and reduce consumption of oil. It can also make economic sense.

Toyota (TM) announced that they would be adding solar cells to their popular Prius electric hybrid. The intention is to use the solar cells to power the air conditioner. It would be better to have the solar cells recharge the battery, although a large enough battery for the plug-in Prius may have to wait until 2010.

Let’s assume that Toyota puts solar cells with 200 watts of power on the car. With 6 hours of charge time, the battery could gain 1.2 KW hours of power. That amounts to equivalent of about 1/10th gallon of gasoline. Assuming $4 per gallon for gasoline, that provides a payback of $0.40 per day or $146 per year. Assuming that the solar cells cost an extra $2,000, then the rate of return on the solar cells is 7.3%, and you are making a small contribution to cleaning up the environment. The solar cells may be eligible for a tax credit, which would make the rate of return higher.

Let’s say you use your Prius to commute to work 15 miles each way. Let’s also assume that you can charge the 1.2 KWh battery at home before you leave and that you travel slow enough to use the entire 1.2 KWh of power on the 15 mile trip to work. The car gets about 50 mpg so the battery could power 1/3 of the trip. On the trip to work you get 75 mpg. On the way home, the solar panels recharge the battery and you again get power for 1/3 of the trip. You get 75 mpg on the way home. You save 1/10th of a gallon of fuel. If you didn’t recharge at work you would burn 0.5 gallons netting 60 mpg.

Shorter trips with longer stays would produce higher gas mileage while longer trips would produce gas mileage closer to 50 mpg.

Solar cells on cars make more cents than solar cells on houses. On a house you are replacing utility power at a rate of 8 cents to 15 cents per KWh. Replacing gasoline for 40 cents (or higher) produces a greater economic return. The rate of return for putting solar cells on cars is great enough to justify demand without incentives, which should be good news for the solar cell manufacturers. This would be particularly true for solar companies that make very efficient solar cells as surface area on the car is limited.

Disclosure: Author holds a long position in TSL and CSIQ

Related Articles

This article has 5 comments:

  •  
    Jul 11 09:12 AM
    What about fuel cells?
    Reply | Link to Comment
  •  
    Jul 11 01:30 PM
    So are you saying that solar cells are cars are economically good or bad? Your figures say it saves very little gas and poor return-on-investment, but you talk like it's good.
    Reply | Link to Comment
  •  
    Jul 11 01:38 PM
    Your analysis only makes cents if utility power is generated from something combusted like coal, gas, oil (maybe nuc) where 70% of the btu's have already gone up the stack, cooling tower, etc.

    If that utility KWH happens to already come from solar or wind which are pure gains from the sun and wind, then the econonomy you speak of has already evaporated.

    The only gain that then exists is within the operation of the hybrid, which only proves that the hybrid should be all electric from solar and not use any hydrocarbon, period. Which is real gain.

    We should not use any hydrocarbon for transportation or power generation. It should all come from wind and solar. That should be our national goal. Totally electric, from wind, solar, tidal, hydro, and nuclear.

    No liquifaction or gasification of coal, natual gas etc., to then burn it. What additional waste. Stupid.

    Hydrocarbons should only be used for where there is no alternative, like plastics, and then even that should come from bio sources, not underground coal, oil, nat. gas etc.

    Reply | Link to Comment
  •  
    Jul 11 10:10 PM
    Can anyone please tell me the estimated P/E for CSIQ this year ?
    my estimate is very low like 9 or 8.
    Reply | Link to Comment
  •  
    Jul 16 08:21 AM
    There is a LOT of IF's in that scenario. Drivers don't drive slow enough to take advantage of better gas mileage. Over 65 MPH, the economies of good MPG get thrown out the window. Think about that the next time you are on the highway.
    Reply | Link to Comment
More Comments on TM ยป
Top Rated Comment Streams:

Numbers are net rating-

See all Top 100 »
More by John Ryden

Investment Resources
Money Management
Research
Seeking Alpha provides these ads as a service to its leading contributors
Articles on related themes
Alternative Energy
Autos
Aircraft & Parts
Airlines