As Bank Industry Analysts Lose Jobs, Serious Blogs Take the Forefront
The most successful analysts are being laid off on Wall Street. The Street has always thought of the analysis as a loss leader for M&A sales and brokerage commissions. After Spitzer tightened down on the industry, they tightened the budgets even more. Now, with this unprecedented downturn combined with the limited ability of the firms to use the analysts to sell other services (the Spitzer conflict of interest argument), the analytical staff is considered expensive dead weight that does not add directly to the revenue line.
If you thought the accuracy of the sell side was bad in the past (see Blog vs. Broker, whom do you trust!), you ain't seen nothin' yet. With conflicts of interest still deeply ingrained in the culture and business models, the top flight (cost?) quality talent fleeing or getting fired, and budgets cut to the bone marrow, expect accuracy and analytical quality to drop considerably below mean - and mean was not very high to begin with.
Luckily, a certain entrepreneurial investor who never was shackled by the hypocritical, recursive conflicts of interests that plagues The Street has decided to share his proprietary research and lo and behold... I really think his research is better!
See Bank industry analysts fall prey to the shrinkage:
Goldman Sachs (GS), Citigroup (C) and Bank of America (BAC) have recently axed analysts who covered some of their competitors. The analysts were particularly prominent within the industry because they were often quoted in Wall Street news stories and invited to meetings with bank executives. They were the voices who questioned executives on earnings calls, and they were often the ones casting most doubt on their field.
Now they join a growing pool of bankers and traders losing their jobs just before bonus time, with little hope of new employment any time soon.
"A lot of these analysts did not believe that they could get sacked," said Gustavo Dolfino, president of WhiteRock Group, a head-hunter in New York. "But just writing about the market doesn't mean you're making any money for the firm, that's why these analysts are losing their jobs."
Goldman was the first major bank to sack its banking analyst, William Tanona. Tanona, laid off Nov. 7, had worked there since 2005, when Goldman recruited him from JPMorgan Chase (JPM) . He was one of the first analysts last fall to turn negative on Citigroup and to warn about Merrill's problems with its bundles of mortgages...
...In a note to clients, the bank, which is cutting 10 percent of its work force, said it was suspending coverage of his companies, which included Merrill Lynch (MER), Morgan Stanley (MS) and Citigroup.
...Last week, Citigroup laid off Prashant Bhatia, who covered a range of brokers and asset mangers like the Fortress Investment Group, Merrill Lynch and BlackRock. Earlier this fall, Bank of America dismissed Michael Hecht, who covered investment banks. A Bank of America spokesman declined to say whether it had begun eliminating overlapping workers among its ranks since it agreed to acquire Merrill Lynch in September.
Banking analysts were not singled out. Goldman, for instance, dismissed a dozen other analysts who covered other industries, including newspapers and industrial companies. In some cases, banks may choose to lay off senior analysts and promote lower-cost workers into their roles.
Anybody looking for analysis can always come to me. I won't even try to push the securities of a company that I just underwrote or try an convince you to allow me to churn your account.
Related Articles
|
Top Rated Comment Streams:
-
1.Hedged In662
- 2.
-
3.Smarty_Pants417
-
4.axelrod608311
-
5.cos1000277




This article has 11 comments:
-
jeandit75
-
7 Comments
Nov 27 08:49 AM-
ex GM emp
-
9 Comments
Nov 27 08:50 AM-
tilut
-
23 Comments
Nov 27 09:38 AM-
lightwarrior
-
4 Comments
Nov 27 10:44 AM-
prescient11
-
109 Comments
Nov 27 11:47 AMFor those who don't know Reggie he's the best around, GGP is his crown jewel. He also called HIG and the other insurers and the downfall of the IBs. His analysis is the best. I shouldn't have closed my short on GGP in the $20s, and you shouldn't have closed it in the teens,wow!
Congrats on all the success man, you've earned it.
-
chartguy
-
12 Comments
Nov 27 01:01 PM-
Anthony Alfidi
-
154 Comments
My Website
Nov 27 07:12 PM-
PrudentMan, CFA
-
154 Comments
Nov 27 07:37 PMGoogle went public alone and it looks as thought they did quite well. As a CFA who has been on both the buy and sell sides, I never found in house sell-side security analysts anything more than pimps for the Investment Banking peddlers.
What an immoral industry that adds absolutely no value to our economy. Do markets really have to revalue companies on every tick? Its can be fun (if you win) but is nothing more than an overrated casino game.
It is amazing that some believe the stock market is a discounter. Makes for silly academics but no real investor believes that. What were we discounting in 2007 when we were entering a recession in February and market took off?
-
Reggie Middleton
-
49 Comments
My Website
Nov 28 08:25 AMI admit the site's design has been outgrown, but I hired a team to work on it. The changes should be evident starting some time today. It appears that you have not subscribed. Everyone must subscribe as well as register, even if you pick a free subscription, it must be done. Try it, and if you still have problems use the "contact us" link. I will make sure your problem is solved.
I will be release two big forensic reports some time today - one of which is a potential bankruptcy candidate. I think it will be worth your time to stop by if you have a paid subscription. As usual I will be putting the free stuff out as well.
As for Seeking Alpha, I am trying to create a working relationship.
-
nyka
-
156 Comments
Nov 28 10:29 PM-
prescient11
-
109 Comments
Dec 05 11:52 PM