Yahoo's Yang: When Love Is Not Enough
Sam Gustin writes: During Jerry Yang's 18-month tenure as chief executive of Yahoo (YHOO), no one ever doubted his love for the company. "All of you know that I have always, and will always bleed purple," Yang wrote in a letter to employees Monday announcing that he will step down.
But in Silicon Valley, as in the rest of corporate America, love is not enough, even coming from the visionary founder of one of the web's most recognizable names. Execution must follow. And that is where Jerry Yang failed.
It's been clear for months that Yang was entirely unsuited to manage the company he co-founded in 1995. Yang should never have been named C.E.O. He should have remained as Chief Yahoo, the position to which he returns, and left the actual management of the business to someone else who didn't carry the emotional baggage that he brought to the job.
Yang's downfall highlights a fundamental business lesson -- especially true in Silicon Valley -- that Yahoo failed to heed: A visionary founder does not a successful C.E.O. make. Google (GOOG) co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin understood that when they brought in Eric Schmidt, a seasoned tech executive, to run their company. Facebook's wunderkind founder Mark Zuckerberg is still trying to achieve that balance with new C.O.O. Sheryl Sandberg.
What Yahoo has needed for the last two years -- and needs now more than ever -- is an experienced manager who will lay out a strategic mission focusing on the company's strengths, while trimming unnecessary assets and resources. Yang was simply too emotionally attached to Yahoo to make the tough decisions in the best interest of the company, until it was too late. Tragically, Yang's loyalty was to the idea of Yahoo, not to the interests of Yahoo's owners, its shareholders.
Related Articles
|
Top Rated Comment Streams:
-
1.Hedged In662
- 2.
-
3.Smarty_Pants413
-
4.axelrod608307
-
5.cos1000278




This article has 5 comments:
-
Jow Bloggs
-
9 Comments
Nov 18 03:07 PM-
Achates
-
5 Comments
Nov 18 03:50 PMI agree with Bloggs, too, that a huge part of Yahoo's troubles have nothing to do with its actual capabilities or organization, but are around the market's perceptions.
I've seen a lot of people say, over the last year, "Why don't Jerry and Sue do something." But nothing that I've seen anyone suggest seemed likely to have a good result for the company (the Microsoft option would have been a nice windfall for some of the shareholders, in the short term, at the expense of giving up any hope of long-term gains). The commenters generally haven't been any better than Yang and Decker at suggesting what actions would make the company better.
Yang and Decker have, in fact, been doing things that actually have made the company better and offer a certain amount of hope for the future, assuming the market gets back to a state that allows anyone to prosper. We'll see what happens; it's hard to be optimistic at the moment - there are no quick solutions to anything when the economic world is this screwed up.
-
mycousinearl
-
9 Comments
Nov 18 04:49 PM-
Robert Nabloid
-
252 Comments
My Website
Nov 18 06:21 PMNow Yahoo is lagging, but it can break into that market and directly compete with google for ad space on third party publisher sites.
-
Mike@orgismo.com
-
1 Comment
My Website
Nov 19 12:45 AMMake somekinda of adsense that make people able to choose where their ads will be placed easily.. that alone will generate enough money.
Think about this, 1$/ads/day multiply by people multiply by pages... thats should do it.
There are tons of ways to make yahoo more profitable, it just needs some creative thoughts and will to do it, something that yahoo lacks right now.
Mike